The question of a good vs bad event changes over time, and is very subjective to a higher cognitive processor. To a Omnisignature there it is not relevant as such. There is only an end product of a cycle. In fact, under this theory the concepts of good, bad, moral, immoral, ethical, and unethical are Omnisignatures themselves. I find that one of the interesting things about events, occurrences, incidents, is that not only are they viewed with different angles, that over time they can change. I find that especially with what we see as negative happenings, that they serve as a warning to others. In some cases lives have been saved because of a tragedy which has served as a warning, or has cause a change. Similarly, what has been seen as a good happening has turned out the opposite as well. Of course, there are the ones that never change also. But I generally find that there are always different perspectives of any Omnisignature, and that view of the Omnisignature is shaped by its membership of its parent / neighbouring Omnisignatures.
